Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -MomentumProfit Zone
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-12 16:25:48
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (42399)
Related
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Two Louisiana Activists Charged with Terrorizing a Lobbyist for the Oil and Gas Industry
- Tesla's stock lost over $700 billion in value. Elon Musk's Twitter deal didn't help
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $400 Satchel Bag for Just $89
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- NFL Star Ray Lewis' Son Ray Lewis III Dead at 28
- Sam Bankman-Fried pleads not guilty to fraud and other charges tied to FTX's collapse
- 2 dead, 5 hurt during Texas party shooting, police say
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- In Florida, Environmental Oversight Improves Under DeSantis, But Enforcement Issues Remain
Ranking
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Billions in NIH grants could be jeopardized by appointments snafu, Republicans say
- Kim Kardashian Proves Her Heart Points North West With Sweet 10th Birthday Tribute
- Christy Turlington’s 19-Year-Old Daughter Grace Burns Makes Runway Debut in Italy
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Clothes That Show Your Pride: Rainbow Fleece Pants, Sweaters, Workout Leggings & More
- Maine lobster industry wins reprieve but environmentalists say whales will die
- Sarah Silverman sues OpenAI and Meta over copied memoir The Bedwetter
Recommendation
Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
Transcript: Ukrainian ambassador Oksana Markarova on Face the Nation, July 9, 2023
Q&A: Why Women Leading the Climate Movement are Underappreciated and Sometimes Invisible
Pritzker-winning architect Arata Isozaki dies at 91
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
Flight fare prices skyrocketed following Southwest's meltdown. Was it price gouging?
Americans are piling up credit card debt — and it could prove very costly
9 wounded in mass shooting in Cleveland, police say